Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GEANTOS TRUCKING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GEANTOS TRUCKING, INC. in 989 AEC DRIVE, WOOD DALE, IL 60191 (NAICS 484110). OSHA activity number 331898403.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Geantos Trucking, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Geantos Trucking, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
989 AEC DRIVE
City
WOOD DALE
State
IL
ZIP
60191
Mailing
989 AEC DRIVE, WOOD DALE, IL 60191
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484110
Employees
60
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $595
29 CFR 1904.4(a):     The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.      On or about January 11, 2012, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2009:    a.  On or about June 10, 2009, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 120 days away from work.    b.  On or about June 24, 2009, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 150 days away from work.    c.  On or about September 3, 2009, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 180 days away from work.    Abatement Certification and Documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $595

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 60 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.4(a):     The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.      On or about January 11, 2012, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2011:    a.  On or about February 3, 2011, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 21 days away from work.    b.  On or about July 1, 2011, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 120 days away from work.    c.  On or about August 11, 2011, an employee suffered an injury(ies) which resulted in at least 142 days away from work.     Abatement Certification and Documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about January 18, 2011, employees of Geantos Trucking, Inc., were working with chemicals such as antifreeze and oil for trucks.  The employer did not have a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (f), (g) and (h) will be met.    Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331898403.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.