Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STACK-ON PRODUCTS CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STACK-ON PRODUCTS CO. in 1800 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 331900829.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stack-On Products CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stack-On Products CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1800 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
LIBERTYVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
60048
Mailing
P.O. BOX 489, WAUCONDA, IL 60084
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that persons were not allowed to be lifted by the forks of a forklift.  Employee(s) were being raised and lowered to attach labels on packages without the use of a manlift basket.        In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The employer did not ensure that truck(s) equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments were marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered.    a) Dock Area- The employer failed to ensure that powered industrial truck(s), such as the Nissan Forklift, Serial #CPJO2A20PV, that were equipped with front end attachments other than the factory installed attachments, such as the clamp attachment which was used to unload containers, were marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and the attachment combination at the maximum elevation with the load laterally centered.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): The employer failed to provide refresher training to operator(s) that had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident.    a)  Facility Wide- The employer failed to ensure that employees that had been involved in accidents involving the powered industrial vehicles were retrained prior to operating a vehicle again.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 M10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(10): A load backrest extension was not used whenever necessary to minimize the possibility of the load or part of the load from falling rearward.    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure all forklifts such as the Toyota Forklift T32199, were equipped with a backrest extension to prevent injury to the operator and lifting mechanisms from rearward falling loads and materials.       In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 N01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(1): All traffic regulations were not observed, including authorized plant speed limits. A safe distance was not maintained between trucks, approximately three truck lengths from the truck ahead, and the trucks were not being kept under control at all times.    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that employees operated forklifts at an appropriate speed and kept a safe traveling distance from one another.  Speed and traveling distance contributed to at least one accident and other near misses.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 Q06

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(6): The employer did not prevent industrial trucks from being altered by the elimination of any parts provided by the manufacturer.       a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that all manufacturer installed parts on forklifts, such as back up alarms, were kept in place and in working condition.        In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, and shall were placed in service at times when examinations showed conditions that could adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examination shall be made at least daily.     a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure all forklifts, such as but not limited to the Nissan and Toyota Forklifts, were examined prior being placed into service and if the examination shows any condition that could adversely affect the safety of the vehicle, such as non-functioning reverse lights, brake lights, reverse alarms, that the truck(s) not be used.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure;    a) Container Area- The employer failed to ensure that permanent wiring was installed to supply power to equipment in the facility, such as the StraPack Semi Automatic Bander.  Extension cords were strung over aisles and attached to posts to supply power to the bander workstation.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2012
Abate by
May 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): The employer failed to ensure flexible cords were only used continuous lengths without splice or tap.      a) Container Area- The employer failed to ensure that flexible cords, such as those supplying power to the StraPack Semi Automatic Strapping Machine, were free of splices.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

View Stack-On Products CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331900829.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.