WOODBRIDGE, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: D'LUCA HOME IMPROVEMENTS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D'LUCA HOME IMPROVEMENTS in 10 CONVERY BLVD., WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331905117.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D'LUCA HOME IMPROVEMENTS
- Site address
- 10 CONVERY BLVD.
- City
- WOODBRIDGE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07095
- Mailing
- 72 GOULD AVENUE, PATERSON, NJ 07503
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,730 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) On or about 02/01/12 CSHO observed an employee operating a Bostitch pneumatic nail gun, installing new roofing shingles while not donning any eye and or face protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2730
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,730 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) On or about 02/01/12 CSHO observed three men working on and from an arched roof, installing new roofing shingles with no fall protection systems in place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2730
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,730 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) On or about 02/01/12 CSHO observed three men used a 20 foot portable aluminum ladder to access the roof when that ladder did not extend three feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2730
- · Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331905117.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.