Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: GRASSER CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRASSER CONSTRUCTION in 6927 HWY 164, WATERFORD, WI 53185 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331909390.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grasser Construction for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grasser Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6927 HWY 164
City
WATERFORD
State
WI
ZIP
53185
Mailing
2811 S. BEAUMONT, KANSASVILLE, WI 53139
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    (a) Employees conducting roofing activities on a 6:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 18.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331909390.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.