Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: VISTA FOOD EXCHANGE INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VISTA FOOD EXCHANGE INC. in B101 HUNTS POINT COOPERATIVE MARKET, BRONX, NY 10474 (NAICS 424440). OSHA activity number 331910513.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vista Food Exchange INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vista Food Exchange INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
B101 HUNTS POINT COOPERATIVE MARKET
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10474
Mailing
B101 HUNTS POINT COOPERATIVE MARKET, BRONX, NY 10474
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424440
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees check on, and add water to, the batteries of powered industrial trucks. The employer did not provide an eye wash station.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees, who operate powered industrial trucks, were not provided with powered industrial truck safety training.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.178 N04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(4):     Drivers were not required to slow down and sound the horn at cross aisles and other locations where vision was obstructed    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees were operating a Clarklift forklift that did not have a operable horn.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):     Where powered industrial trucks were found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the trucks were not taken out of service until they had been restored to safe operating condition    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees were operating powered industrial trucks that were not in safe operating condition. The Clark electric Clarklift did not have an operable horn or backup alarm. The headlights did not work. The Yale forklift was missing the right headlamp.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1):     Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees were operating powered industrial trucks that were not in safe operating condition. The Clark electric Clarklift did not have an operable horn or backup alarm. The headlights did not work. The Yale forklift was missing the right headlamp.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2012
Abate by
Jun 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):     Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle    location: Bays E-16-23  on or about: 2/8/12    a) Employees were operating powered industrial trucks that were not in safe operating condition. A daily examination of the trucks was not conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331910513.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.