OSHA Inspection: GRAY'S BREWING CO.

Issued

Jul 13, 2012

Abate by

Jul 27, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    Where employee(s) are using chemicals, including but not limited to: San-I-King NO. 451 and Alkali LF, NO. 257, the employer did not ensure affected employees use appropriate eye and face protection.

Issued

Jul 13, 2012

Abate by

Jul 27, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    Where employee(s) are using chemicals, including but not limited to: San-I-King NO. 451 and Alkali LF, NO. 257, suitable facilities for drenching of eyes and body were not provided.

Issued

Jul 13, 2012

Abate by

Aug 30, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area.    Where employee(s) are using chemicals, including but not limited to: San-I-King NO. 451 and Alkali LF, NO. 257, the employer did not provide employees with training.

Issued

Jul 13, 2012

Abate by

Jul 27, 2012

Penalty

Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(ii)(H): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training on workplace-related topics including closed environments and other areas where insufficient ventilation or poor vehicle maintenance could cause a buildup of carbon monoxide or diesel exhaust.    Where employee(s) are operating powered industrial vehicles in closed environments, the employer did not provide training on the hazards of carbon monoxide.

Issued

Jul 13, 2012

Abate by

Aug 30, 2012

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial vehicle.     Where employee(s) are operating a forklift, the employer did not ensure that each operator completed training.