SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: MANITOBA CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANITOBA CORPORATION in 101 MONROE STREET, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 331912451.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANITOBA CORPORATION
- Site address
- 101 MONROE STREET
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63102
- Mailing
- 101 MONROE STREET, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: Plant: Operators of powered industrial trucks such as, but not limited to, TCM forklifts and Bobcats were not provided required training prior to being permitted to operate the powered industrial trucks. Abatement certification and abatement documentation are required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s) (a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY) Plant: A forklift with damaged brake and signal lights and missing slip resistant pad on the brake pedal was not removed from service until repaired. Abatement certification and abatement documentation are required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,530 · Current $1,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rests. On offhand grinding machines, work rests shall be used to support the work. They shallbe of rigid construction and designed to be adjustable to compensate for wheel wear. Work rests shall be kept adjusted closely to the wheel with amaximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage. The work rest shall be securely clamped after each adjustment. The adjustment shall not be made with the wheel in motion: Maintenance Room: Workrest was missing from a bench grinder and the workrest on the right side was 7/8" from the wheel. Abatement certification and abatement documentation are required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1071
- — Z (S) $1530
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: (a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY) Maintenance Shop: A Dayton six inch abrasive wheel bench grinder did not have a tongue guard on the left side and the installed tongue guard on the right side was not used. Abatement certification and abatement documentation are required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Manitoba Corporation
View Manitoba Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331912451.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.