Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ZERODRAFT

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ZERODRAFT in 2824 LEMOYNE AVENUE, MATTYDALE, NY 13211 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 331917484.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zerodraft — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zerodraft is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ZERODRAFT
Site address
2824 LEMOYNE AVENUE
City
MATTYDALE
State
NY
ZIP
13211
Mailing
2824 LEMOYNE AVENUE, MATTYDALE, NY 13211
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) Throughout the jobsite, on or about 3/28/12: A written respirator program was not implemented for employees required to wear powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) during applications of spray-on insulation containing 4,4 Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI).    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):     The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:       a) Throughout the facility, on or about 3/28/12: A reasonable assessment of exposure was not performed for employees required to wear powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) during applications of spray-on insulation containing 4,4 -Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:       a) Throughout the facility, on or about 3/28/12: Medical evaluations were not provided for employees required to wear powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) during applications of spray-on insulation containing 4,4 Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI).    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):     The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter    a) Throughout the facility, on or about 3/28/12: Fit testing was not perfromed on employees required to wear powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) during applications of spray-on insulation containing 4,4 Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI).    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.134(k):     The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:    a) Throughout the facility, on or about 3/28/12: Training on respiratory protection was not providedf or employees required to wear powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) during applications of spray-on insulation containing 4,4 -Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI).    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.55 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1926.55(a):     Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists:    a) The work site at 813 Salisbury Road, Syracuse, NY 13219, on or about 3/28/12: Insulation applicator applying foam insulation in attic crawl space was overexposed to a concentration of Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate at 0.27 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) or 1.35 times the ceiling concentration of 0.2 mg/m3 during the 15 minute sampling period.    b) The work site at 813 Salisbury Road, Syracuse, NY 13219, on or about 3/28/12: Insulation applicator applying foam insulation in attic crawl space was overexposed to a concentration of Methylene Bisphenyl Isocyanate at 0.37 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) or 1.85 times the ceiling concentration of 0.2 mg/m3 during the 15 minute sampling period.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2012
Abate by
Jul 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):     Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a) Throughout the facility, on or about 4/18/12: Training on the details of the written hazard communication program was not provided for employees working with hazardoius chemicals including, but not limited to Demilec spray-on insulation containing Methylene Bisphenol Diisocyanate.    Abatement Certification must be provided for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Zerodraft's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331917484.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.