COLORADO SPRINGS, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: FENDERS RESTORATION, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FENDERS RESTORATION, INC. in 1425 DUSTRY DR., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80905 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 331920033.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FENDERS RESTORATION, INC.
- Site address
- 1425 DUSTRY DR.
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80905
- Mailing
- 1425 DUSTRY DR., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80905
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- May 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, areas of the shop including the mixing area were not kept clean and orderly.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.106 E02 IV A
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- May 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii): Flammable liquids were not kept in covered containers when not actually in use: a) On or about February 17, 2012, containers of flammable solvents were left with the lids off in the paint storage and mixing area when these were not in use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,530 · Current $765 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, employees were not protected from respiratory hazards in that, the employer had not developed and implemented a respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures that includes but is not limited to procedures for selecting respirators; Cartridge change-out schedules; fit testing procedures; procedures for proper use, maintenance and cleaning of respirators; training of employees on respiratory hazards and proper respirator use and limitations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $765
- · Z (S) $1530
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, the employer had not provided a medical evalaution for employees who were using respirators at the site to determine their ability to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- May 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical hazards from uncovered electrical fixtures on the exterior of the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- May 3, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) On or about February 17, 2012 and at times prior, the employer did not maintain copies of material safety data sheets for each hazardous material in the workplace including, but not limited to, paints, primers, hardeners/activators, solvents and fillers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331920033.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.