SPRINGFIELD, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: THE RAWAC PLATING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of THE RAWAC PLATING COMPANY in 125 NORTH BELL AVENUE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45504 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 331920306.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE RAWAC PLATING COMPANY
- Site address
- 125 NORTH BELL AVENUE
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45504
- Mailing
- 125 NORTH BELL AVENUE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45504
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A09
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,734 · Current $1,214 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(9): Every floor hole into which persons cannot accidentally walk (on account of fixed machinery,equipment, or walls) shall be protected by a cover that leaves no openings more than 1 inch wide. The cover shall be securely held in place to preventtools or materials from falling through. The employer did not ensure that a floor hole with an opening of more than 1 inch wide was covered in that on or about February 23, 2012 a floor hole on Plating Line #11 work platform measuring 5 1/2 inches by 5 1/2 inches was not covered creating a tripping hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1214
- · Z (S) $1734
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. The employer did not ensure that employees wore face protection when transferring nitric acid (corrosive) from a 5 gallon container to a 1 gallon container and manually pouring into the plating tanks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2040
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,734 · Current $1,214 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. The outer insulation on the power cord for the parts hopper on Line #14 had pulled away from the bushing creating strain on the interconnectors/fittings.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1214
- · Z (S) $1734
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,301 · Current $910 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: The employer did not ensure that portable containers were labeled with the identity of the chemical in that on or about February 23, 2012 5 gallon containers containing Perma Pass Ultra (corrosive) and Enseal C23 (irritant) were not labled with the identity of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $910.3
- · Z (S) $1300.5
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): Appropriate hazard warnings, or alternatively, words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof,which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediatelyavailable to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and healthhazards of the hazardous chemical. The employer did not ensure that portable containers were labeled with hazard warning labels in that on or about February 23, 2012, 5 gallon portable containers containing Perma Pass Ultra (corrosive) and Enseal C23 (irritant) were not labeled with hazard warning labels.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $510 · Current $357 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): Post the annual summary. The employer did not post the annual OSHA 300A Summary Sheet for 2011 in that at the time of the inspection on February 23, 2012 the summary sheet was not posted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $357
- · Z (O) $510
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331920306.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.