Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: LANCER LABEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LANCER LABEL in 301 SOUTH 74TH STREET, OMAHA, NE 68114 (NAICS 323119). OSHA activity number 332425412.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lancer Label for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lancer Label is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LANCER LABEL
Site address
301 SOUTH 74TH STREET
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68114
Mailing
301 SOUTH 74TH STREET, OMAHA, NE 68114
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323119
Employees
150
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2012
Abate by
Jul 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to the items of this section:    Jobsite located at 301 South 74th Street, Omaha, NE, Throughout the Facility:  Lockout/tagout procedures did not meet the requirements outlined above.  The developed procedures are vague in that they do not clearly specify the techniques in which lockout operations will be performed and they do not clearly indicate the locations where energy may be isolated (switches, valves, breaker numbers, etc).      Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C06 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2012
Abate by
Jul 25, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):     The employer failed to conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.    Jobsite located at 301 South 74th Street, Omaha, NE, Throughout the Facility:  The employer failed to conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures as outlined in the standard.      Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2012
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    Jobsite located at 301 South 74th Street; Maintenance Shop:  Four pieces of equipment in the area were not equipped with machine guarding to prevent the employees from contacting rotating parts or other injurious movements:    a)  Hipromac1440 Metal Lathe; no guarding around the rotating chuck.    b)  Sheldon Metal Lathe; no guarding around the rotating chuck.    c)  Cadillac Metal Lathe; no guarding around the rotating chuck.    d)  Delta Drill Press; no guarding around the rotating chuck.      Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $2000
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.212 A03 II

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2012
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    At the following locations, Jobsite located at 301 South 74th Street, Maintenance Shop:  Three pieces of equipment in the area were not equipped with point of operation guarding to protect the operator and other employees:    a)  Hipromac1440 Metal Lathe; there was not any type of protective shield for the area around the cutting head.      b)  Sheldon Metal Lathe; there was not any type of protective shield for the area around the cutting head.      c)  Cadillac Metal Lathe; there was not any type of protective shield for the area around the cutting head.      Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2012
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    Maintenance Area:  The tongue guards bench mounted grinder was not adjusted to within  inch of the wheel.  In this case, there was not a guard installed.      Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $4000

View Lancer Label's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332425412.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.