Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: H. BARBER & SONS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H. BARBER & SONS, INC. in 15 RAYTKWICH DRIVE, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 332789346.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H. Barber & Sons, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H. Barber & Sons, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15 RAYTKWICH DRIVE
City
NAUGATUCK
State
CT
ZIP
06770
Mailing
15 RAYTKWICH DRIVE, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
18
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a site specific hazardous energy control lockout/tagout program consisting of machine specific step-by-step written energy control procedures and employee training for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the saw and overhead cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented step-by-step written energy control procedures in the machine specific for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the saw and overhead cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    WORKSHOP:  The employees, as "affected and other types" were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lockout/tagout) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the saw and overhead cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not evaluated the powered industrial truck (PIT) operators' performance at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating part and saw blade:    WORKSHOP:  The parts of the following machinery were unguarded:    1.  The chuck of the Jet 1430 lathe was unguarded.    2.  The left and right unused portions of the saw blade of the Lian Feng Machine, horizontal bandsaw were partially unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of  personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2012
Abate by
Apr 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) the paints and hydraulic oil.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332789346.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.