Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACVB GENERAL CONTRACTOR, LLC

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of ACVB GENERAL CONTRACTOR, LLC in BLDG # 2, OAK MEADOW DR., BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 238330). OSHA activity number 332789775.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Acvb General Contractor, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Acvb General Contractor, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BLDG # 2, OAK MEADOW DR.
City
BROOKFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06804
Mailing
690 SYLVAN AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238330
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2012
Abate by
Apr 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):  Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Worksite: The employee who was working from the platform of a supported scaffold at a height of approximately 13 feet above the ground was not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2012
Abate by
Apr 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  Worksite: The employees who were working on the second floor of the residential building under construction at a height of approximately 10 feet 8 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2012
Abate by
May 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    Worksite: The employee, working from an elevated platform without fall protection at a height of approximately 13 feet above the ground was not trained to recognize the hazards associated with working from scaffold platforms.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2012
Abate by
May 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:    Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet 8 inches above the ground while working on the second floor of the building under construction were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332789775.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.