Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACTION AUTOMATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACTION AUTOMATION in 5160 W. 125TH PLACE, ALSIP, IL 60803 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 332795384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Action Automation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Action Automation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ACTION AUTOMATION
Site address
5160 W. 125TH PLACE
City
ALSIP
State
IL
ZIP
60803
Mailing
5160 W. 125TH PLACE, ALSIP, IL 60803
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.[63 FR 33450, June 18, 1998]    a.  On or about March 7, 2012, in the work area, employees required to work with sodium hydroxide were not provided with suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).      a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, employees were required to operate powered industrial vehicles.  The employees did not receive training on the safe operation of the powered industrial vehicles.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety datasheets.    a. On or about March 7. 2012, in the shop, the employees were not trained in the hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to, sodium hydroxide and acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i):     Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard shall ensure that a "competent person" conducts an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace. The assessment must be completed in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by exposure data or the lack of a "negative exposure assessment," and to provide information necessary to assure that all control systems planned are appropriate for that operation and will work properly.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop,  employees are required to remove gaskets which may contain asbestos from old actuators. There was no initial monitoring performed and no bulk samples taken to determine the presence of asbesots.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.1101 G09 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(9)(i):     The work shall be performed using wet methods.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, employees remove gaskets that potentially contain up to 70% asbesots and did not use a wet method prevent the release of asbestos fibers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(v):     Training for Class III employees shall be consistent with EPA requirements for training of local education agency maintenance and custodial staff as set forth at 40 CFR 763.92(a)(2). Such a course shall also include "hands-on" training and shall take at least 16 hours. Exception: For Class III operations for which the competent person determines that the EPA curriculum does not adequately cover the training needed to perform that activity, training shall include as a minimum all the elements included in paragraph (k)(9)(viii) of this section and in addition, the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in paragraph (g) of this section which specifically relate to that activity, and shall include "hands-on" training in the work practices applicable to each category of material that the employee disturbs.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, employees removed gaskets potentially containing 70% asbestos and were not provided the required training for Class III asbestos work.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 L01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(1):       Vacuuming  . Where vacuuming methods are selected, HEPA filtered vacuuming equipment must be used. The equipment shall be used and emptied in a manner that minimizes the reentry of asbestos into the workplace.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, the employees were not provided a HEPA vacuum to clean the floor and surfaces from any fallen asbestos when removing old gaskets, which may contain 70 % chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 L02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(2):       Waste disposal  . Asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal shall be collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers except in roofing operations where the procedures specified in paragraph (g)(8)(ii) of this section apply.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, the employees were not provided a labeled sealable bag for disposal of the asbestos containing gaskets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(o)(1):     General. On all construction worksites covered by this standard, the employer shall designate a competent person, having the qualifications and authorities for ensuring worker safety and health required by Subpart C, General Safety and Health Provisions for Construction (29 CFR 1926.20 through 1926.32).    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, there was no competent person to evaluate the potential for asbestos in the gaskets before the dismantling work began.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 O04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(o)(4)(ii):     For Class III and IV asbestos work, the competent person shall be trained in aspects of asbestos handling appropriate for the nature of the work, to include procedures for setting up glove bags and mini-enclosures, practices for reducing asbestos exposures, use of wet methods, the contents of this standard, and the identification of asbestos. Such training shall include successful completion of a course that is consistent with EPA requirements for training of local education agency maintenance and custodial staff as set forth at 40 CFR 763.92(a)(2), or its equivalent in stringency, content, and length. Competent persons for Class III and IV work, may also be trained pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (o)(4)(i) of this section.      a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, there was no trained competent person to evaluate the potential for gaskets to contain asbestos before the work began
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     'Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.    a. On or about March 7, 2012, employees working at refineries, steel mills and power plants were required to wear fire retardant clothing. The employees were not provided the fire retardant clothing by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):     In addition, the employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).    a. On or about March 7, 2012, in the shop, an employee wore a half mask respirator but was not medically evaluated or trained in a respirator program.  Employees provided N95 dust masks were not provided Appendix D of this standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332795384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.