Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: THE B. F. SHAW PRINTING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE B. F. SHAW PRINTING COMPANY in 3200 E. LINCOLNWAY P.O. BOX 498, STERLING, IL 61081 (NAICS 511110). OSHA activity number 332799964.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The B. F. Shaw Printing Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The B. F. Shaw Printing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3200 E. LINCOLNWAY P.O. BOX 498
City
STERLING
State
IL
ZIP
61081
Mailing
3200 E. LINCOLNWAY P.O. BOX 498, STERLING, IL 61081
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
511110
Employees
125
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):   Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.    A.B. Dick 1-Color Press (Serial No. 9007-02225, Model No. 360).  There was no guard to prevent employees from getting their clothing or hands caught in the inrunning nip point(s) between the moving rollers during normal production and while cleaning the rollers.    There is no documentation or certification of abatement required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2677.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): General requirements for machine guards. Guards were not affixed to the machine where possible and secured elsewhere if for any reason attachment to the machine is not possible. The guard shall be such that it does not offer an accident hazard in itself.    Goss Urbanite Press.  Barrier guards covering inrunning nip points between printing rollers on the Goss Urbanite press were not affixed to the machine.     a)     Between A & B (top) - 2 guards    b)     E - 2 guards    c)     C  (top) - 2 guards    d)     A (top) - 1 guard    There is no documentation or certification of abatement required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2677.5
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment was not installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.    Strapper Machine Area.  An electrical box (480V) with multiple outlets was used on the end of a flexible cord for plugging in the strapper machine daily.  The box had pre-punched knockouts, therefore exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard when they used one hand to stabilize the box while plugging in the machine with the other hand.    There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2142
  • · Z (S) $3060

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):  Certification. The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.    The employer did not certify that all employees authorized to operate powered industrial trucks in the workplace had received training and a performance evaluation at least once every three years.    There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed.      Inserting Line Area.  An electrical box (240V) for the conveyor motor for the inserting line had two openings created by missing knockouts  The box was covered by a piece of corrugated cardboard taped onto the machine to protect the area from dust and debris.    There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332799964.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.