KENOSHA, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: BUTTERA'S EXTERIORS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUTTERA'S EXTERIORS in 4131 18TH AVE., KENOSHA, WI 53140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 332805241.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUTTERA'S EXTERIORS
- Site address
- 4131 18TH AVE.
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53140
- Mailing
- 3905 29TH AVE. LOWER UNIT, KENOSHA, WI 53140
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) An employee conducting roofing activities on a roof with a 9:12 pitch was not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 12.9 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2012
- Abate by
- May 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards. (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee exposed to fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with the work. This exposed the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 12.9 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332805241.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.