Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL UNIFORM & LINEN SUPPLY CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CENTRAL UNIFORM & LINEN SUPPLY CO. in 802 S. WAHSATCH AVE., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903 (NAICS 812331). OSHA activity number 332808757.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Central Uniform & Linen Supply CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Central Uniform & Linen Supply CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
802 S. WAHSATCH AVE.
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
80903
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2289, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812331
Employees
46
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, the employer had not established a complete hazardous energy control program at the site in that, a written procedure was not in place, training was not conducted, and periodic inspections were not conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1785

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, employees were exposed to injury while operating and working around the ironers due to the following:    1.  Nip points between the large roller at the front of the machines and the structure of the machines.    2.  Ends of the rollers (shafts) were not covered or otherwise protected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i):  Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, a shaft was unguarded on the small ironer which projected more than 1/2 the diameter of the shaft.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, employees were not protected from injury in that, a portion of the drive on the middle ironer near the floor was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, the employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been completed through written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, the employer did not certify that one of the operators at the site had been trained on forklift operation.  The employer also did not certify that operators had been evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, material was stored on and around several electrical panels in the soil room lift area, limiting access to these.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2012
Abate by
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in    a)  On or about March 14, 2012 and at times prior, all employees were not provided with effective training on the hazardous chemicals in the work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332808757.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.