DARIEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: GREAT CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREAT CONSTRUCTION LLC in 144 FIVE MILE RIVER ROAD, DARIEN, CT 06820 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 332812114.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GREAT CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 144 FIVE MILE RIVER ROAD
- City
- DARIEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06820
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: JOBSITE: The employee, cutting wood with a DeWalt Circular Saw, was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1800
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections were not avoided. Flexible cords and cables that passed through doorways or other pinch points were not protected from damage. JOBSITE: A yellow/black flexible cord, used to power a DeWalt Circular saw, ran through a doorway, then through a room scattered with debris, then through a wall opening of a house.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1800
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.405 G01 III E
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(iii)(E): Flexible cords were run where concealed behind building walls, ceilings, or floors. JOBSITE: A yellow/black flexible cord, used to power a DeWalt Circular saw, ran through a doorway, around material and under debris, then through a wall opening of a house.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. JOBSITE: The employees, engaged in framing of a house in close proximity of the window/wall openings on the Second (2nd) level were exposed to the hazard of falling 11 feet 5 inches to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. JOBSITE: The employees, exposed to the hazard of falling while performing framing of a house, were not provided with information and training to control or minimize such hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. JOBSITE: The employees, using a stairway to access the upper level of a house, were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use and handling of stairways.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: Note: When the top edge of a stairrail system also serves as a handrail, paragraph (c)(7) of this section applies. JOBSITE: The left side ascending/open side of the stairway, having 17 risers/steps and used by the employees during the framing work, was not equipped with appropriate handrail and stairrail system.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3000
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors: JOBSITE: The employer was neither using Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (GFCI) nor utilizing an Assured Equipment Grounding Conductor Program for employees protection while using electrical tools.
Recent events (3)
- — A (O) $0
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures were not be permanent and continuous. JOBSITE: The attachment plug of the orange/black flexible cord used to power a DeWalt Circular saw, was missing a grounding pin.
Recent events (3)
- — A (O) $0
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Great Construction LLC
View Great Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332812114.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.