WEST HAVEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DADDY AND RYAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DADDY AND RYAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC in 57 FORREST AVE., WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 332813427.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DADDY AND RYAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 57 FORREST AVE.
- City
- WEST HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06516
- Mailing
- 156 FARREN AVE., 1ST FLOOR, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the ground and exposed to overhead hazards were provided with and required to wear hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b). Worksite: Employees who were performing roofing activities on a residential roof were exposed to fall hazards of up to 204 and were not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2640
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees had be trained in the hazards associated with falls and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Worksite: Employees were accessing the roof using an aluminum extension ladder that only extended approximately 1 foot above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B20
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees were not facing the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder: Worksite: Employees who were descending the aluminum extension ladder did not face the ladder as they climbed down from the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332813427.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.