Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: DADDY AND RYAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DADDY AND RYAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC in 57 FORREST AVE., WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 332813427.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daddy and Ryan General Construction LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daddy and Ryan General Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
57 FORREST AVE.
City
WEST HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06516
Mailing
156 FARREN AVE., 1ST FLOOR, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:          Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that employees who were working on the ground and exposed to overhead hazards were provided with and required to wear hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b).      Worksite:  Employees who were performing roofing activities on a residential roof were exposed to fall hazards of up to 204 and were not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2640
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2012
Abate by
Apr 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:          Worksite:  The employer did not ensure that all employees had be trained in the hazards associated with falls and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:        Worksite:  Employees were accessing the roof using an aluminum extension ladder that only extended approximately 1 foot above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B20

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20):     Employees were not facing the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder:        Worksite:  Employees who were descending the aluminum extension ladder did  not face the ladder as they climbed down from the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332813427.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.