PORTLAND, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: R.C.B. TIRE, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R.C.B. TIRE, LLC in 1611 PORTLAND COBALT ROAD, PORTLAND, CT 06480 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 332813765.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R.C.B. TIRE, LLC
- Site address
- 1611 PORTLAND COBALT ROAD
- City
- PORTLAND
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06480
- Mailing
- 1611 PORTLAND COBALT ROAD, PORTLAND, CT 06480
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to serious multiple injuries or death from being struck by falling vehicles: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, performing service and repair of motor vehicles that were hoisted up by auto lifts, were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling motor vehicles at the following bays. A) Bay 3; Rotary Lift, Model #SPOAO-202. B) Bay 5; Rotary Lift, Model #SPOA9A300.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Inside of buildings, cylinders were not stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 (6.1 m) feet from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior. Cylinders should be stored in definitely assigned places away from elevators, stairs, or gangways. Assigned storage spaces were located where cylinders could be knocked over or damaged by passing or falling objects, or subject to tampering by unauthorized persons. ESTABLISHMENT: An oxygen compressed gas cylinder, stored adjacent to a passageway was subject to being knocked over or displaced; an acetylene cylinder had been stored next to a 55 gallon drum of oil.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage shall be separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour. ESTABLISHMENT: Oxygen and acetylene compressed gas cylinders were stored 5 feet 6 inches apart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers were subjected to an annual maintenance check. ESTABLISHMENT: Two portable ABC fire extinguishers were last services in September, 2010.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide information and training on Hazard Communication program to employees who were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) acetylene and oxygen.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332813765.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.