POLAND, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: LEDGEMONT BUILDERS INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LEDGEMONT BUILDERS INC. in 8012 N. LIMA RD., POLAND, OH 44514 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 332816610.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEDGEMONT BUILDERS INC.
- Site address
- 8012 N. LIMA RD.
- City
- POLAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44514
- Mailing
- 754 BEDFORD RD. SE, BROOKFIELD, OH 44403
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: On 03/16/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee that was operating a rough terrain forklift had been evaluated every three years.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): On 03/16/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure a forklift operator was evaluated in accordance with the criteria contained in paragraph L of CFR 1910.178.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms without being specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: On 03/16/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure a personnel platform being lifted by a rough terrain forklift was approved for use by the manufacturer or by a certified engineer.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Mar 28, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person: On 03/16/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure a certified anchor point capable of supporting 5, 000 lbs. was used when employees tied off to a forklift that was elevating a personnel platform.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 332816610.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.