MIDDLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: WEATHERTIGHT ROOFING, SIDING, & GUTTERS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WEATHERTIGHT ROOFING, SIDING, & GUTTERS in 6816 ALGONQUIN DR., MIDDLETON, WI 53562 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 332822246.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WEATHERTIGHT ROOFING, SIDING, & GUTTERS
- Site address
- 6816 ALGONQUIN DR.
- City
- MIDDLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53562
- Mailing
- 3424 LAKE FARM RD., MADISON, WI 53711
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 10, 2012
- Abate by
- May 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Employer did not ensure that employees were wearing safety glasses while using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles on a roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 10, 2012
- Abate by
- May 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employer did not ensure that employees were wearing fall protection while installing shingles on a roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332822246.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.