Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BOOTHEEL TOOL & MACHINE CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BOOTHEEL TOOL & MACHINE CO. in 920 SCOTT AVENUE, DEXTER, MO 63841 (NAICS 333515). OSHA activity number 332823715.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bootheel Tool & Machine CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bootheel Tool & Machine CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
920 SCOTT AVENUE
City
DEXTER
State
MO
ZIP
63841
Mailing
920 SCOTT AVENUE, DEXTER, MO 63841
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333515
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(i): On stairways less than 44 inches wide having both sides enclosed, at least one handrail, preferably on the right side, was not installed:    a/  The stairway leading up to three offices was not equipped with a suitable hand rail.  The wooden stairway was seven risers high, approximately 36 inches wide, and enclosed on both sides.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment:    a/  The workplace hazard assessment was not certified.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.132 F04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(4): The employer did not verify that each affected employee had received and understood the required PPE training through a written certification that contained the name of each employee trained, the date(s) of training, and that identified the subject of the certification:    a/  Employee training in when, where, and how to wear, maintain, and dispose of personal protective equipment was not verified.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there was a hazard from flying objects:    a/  Inside of the milling area, one employee was observed operating the Lagun Vertical Milling Machine, s/n 88-1214988, with prescription safety glasses.  These glasses were not provided with side shields.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Inside of the milling area, the chucks belonging to the following machines were unguarded:    a/  Do-All Vertical Milling Machine, s/n 91220624.  b/  Victor Lathe, s/n 70415.  c/  Victor Lathe, s/n 561244.  d/  Do-All Vertical Milling Machine, s/n 88121498.  e/  Lagun Vertical Milling Machine, s/n 49440.  f/   Lagun Vertical Milling Machine, s/n 49446.    Inside of the cutting area, the chucks belonging to the following machines were unguarded:    a/  Alliant Vertical Milling Machine, 949-3V.  b/  Supermax Vertical Milling Machine, m/n YC-1-9.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:      Inside of the milling area, the following machine was not secured to the concrete floor:    a/  8-Inch Bench Grinder (pedestal mounted).    Inside of the cutting area, the following machine was not secured to the concrete floor:    a/  Bolder Pedestal 6-Inch Grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:      Inside of the milling area, the work rest belonging to the 8-Inch Bench Grinder (pedestal mounted) was approximately three-eighths of an inch away from the abrasive wheel.    Inside of the cutting area, the work rest belonging to the Bolder Pedestal 6-Inch Grinder. was approximately one inch away from the work rest.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    Inside of the milling area, the peripheral protecting member belonging to the 8-Inch Bench Grinder could not be adjusted.  The distance between the abrasive wheel and the peripheral guard was approximately one and one quarter inch.      Inside of the cutting area, the peripheral protecting member belonging to the Bolder Pedestal 6-Inch Grinder could not be adjusted.  The distance between the abrasive wheel and the peripheral guard was approximately one half inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a/  Inside of the cutting area, the compressed air hose was set at approximately 100 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2):     Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    a/  Inside of the cutting area, the pedestrian route located along the south wall was not marked with an appropriate sign reading "EXIT".
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): Training did not consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace:    a/  Inside of the machine shop, the operators of the Caterpillar Fork Truck, GP-1, s/n 3AM09945, did not receive formal instruction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Abate by
May 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     a/  A written hazard communication program was developed or maintained in the workplace that described how proper labeling was to be adhered to, material safety data sheets maintained, and employee training in the safe use and clean up of hazardous materials such as cutting and motor oil and grease was to be conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332823715.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.