RUTHERFORD, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: VCC CONTRACTING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VCC CONTRACTING in ELIZABETH STREET, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 332824606.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VCC CONTRACTING
- Site address
- ELIZABETH STREET
- City
- RUTHERFORD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07070
- Mailing
- 454 CHESTNUT STREET, RIDGEFIELD, NJ 07657
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) 225 Sanford Avenue, Lyndhurst-NJ: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working below other employees that were performing framing activities. The employees were not protected with hard hats or protective helmets, on or about January 30th, 2012.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. A) Elizabeth Street, Rutherford - NJ: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while engaged in framing work on a residential structure, on or about January 30th 2012.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: A) Elizabeth Street, Rutherford - NJ: Employees were using the top step of a 6 foot folding step ladder in order to access the upper most level of the residential structure in which they were working on, on or about January 30th 2012.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332824606.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.