Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GEORGE INDUSTRIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GEORGE INDUSTRIES, INC. in 1 S. PAGE AVENUE, ENDICOTT, NY 13760 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 332837681.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch George Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for George Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 S. PAGE AVENUE
City
ENDICOTT
State
NY
ZIP
13760
Mailing
1 S. PAGE AVENUE, ENDICOTT, NY 13760
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):  A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA:    a)  An employee working as a Deburrer was exposed to continuous noise at a sound level of approximately 88.9 dBA (8 hour time weighted average) during the 432 minute sampling period on 6/20/12. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 48 minutes not sampled. Employee was not wearing ear plugs.    b)  An employee working as a Cleaner in the Dip Tank Area was exposed to continuous noise at a sound level of approximately 97.1 dBA (8 hour time weighted average) during the 422 minute sampling period on 6/20/12.  Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 58 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear plugs.    Abatement methodology:    Step 1: An effective hearing conservation program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) shall be maintained.  An effective hearing conservation program shall include, at a minimum:    (1)  a baseline audiogram for all employees exposed to noise levels equal to or in excess of the standard.    (2)  Annual audiograms for each overexposed employee    (3)  analysis of audiogram results with retesting and/or referral to an otolaryngologist or qualified physician when a significant threshold shift occurs.  A significant shift will be considered to be equal to or greater than an average of 30 dba over the 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz frequencies.    (4)  Where insert ear plugs or custom-molded devices are utilized, individual employee fitting shall be conducted by a trained person, and employees shall be instructed in the care and use of the devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.95 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1):  A copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 was not made available to affected employees or their representatives nor was a copy posted in the workplace:    a)  George Industries Inc., on or about 6/20/12: The employer did not provide a copy of 1910.95 to the affected employees, or post a copy in the workplace, when employees were exposed to noise that exceeded the 8-hour time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)  Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:    a)  Spray Paint Area, on or about 6/20/12: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employee was required to wear half face air purifying respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): When voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer shall provide the respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to this section:    a)  Throughout the facility, on or about 4/4/12: Employer allows voluntary use of dust masks and has not supplied employees with Appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) Employees required to wear negative pressure respirators were not provided with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator:    a)  Spary Paint Area, on or about 6/20/12:  Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators and had not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:    a) Spray Paint Area, on or about 6/20/12:  Employees required to wear a half face air purifying respirator and had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Oct 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)  The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:    a)  Spray Paint Area, on or about 6/20/12:  Employees required to wear a half face air purifying respirator and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    a)  Throughout the facility, on or about 6/20/12: Employees using metal electrical boxes connected to flexible cords hanging from the bus bar that were not in accordance with UL approval.  Boxes are listed for permanent mounting only.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Abate by
Aug 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5):  The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous and effective:    a)  Machine Shop, on or about 3/29/12: Floor fan near Horizontal CNC OKK A19 had ground pin missing from plug end.    b)  Machine Shop, on or about 3/29/12: Floor fan near Horizontal Haas A13 had ground pin missing from plug end.    c)  Truck Bay, on or about 3/29/12: Floor fan had ground pin missing from plug end.    d)  Deburr Area, on or about 4/4/12: Floor fan had ground pin missing from plug end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1027 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i):  Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this  section shall determine if any employee may be exposed to cadmium at or above the action level:          a)   Welding Area, on or about 6/20/12: Employee was Tig Welding Aluminum containing cadmium. Employer had not conducted inital monitoring to determine employee expsore.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): Each employer shall determine the 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    a)  Dip tank Area, on or about 6/20/12: The exposure to chromium (VI) was not determined for employees working in the Dip Tank Area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View George Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332837681.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.