Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 151 STALLION CIRCLE, SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 332838341.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rudd Construction, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rudd Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
151 STALLION CIRCLE
City
SNOWMASS VILLAGE
State
CO
ZIP
81615
Mailing
132 PARK AVENUE, BASALT, CO 81621
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 13 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,607 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from fall objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, employer did not ensure that each employee conducting work in the house under construction was provided hard hats. This condition exposed employees to a possible danger of head in from impact, or from falling or flying objects from elevation, or from electrical shock and burns.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $960
  • · Z (S) $1606.5

1926.200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,607 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(1):  Construction areas were not posted with required traffic points of hazards:    (a)  Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that traffic control signs or devices were used for protection of construction workers against in-coming or out-coming  road users in the residential complex.  Employees were sweeping the streets without the use of any traffic control signs or devices for protection.  Additionally, an aerial lift operator was working partially on the street without any barricade protection. These conditions exposed employees to strike-by hazards from approaching traffic, construction equipment and moving vehicles.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1606.5

1926.404 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,142 · Current $1,285 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120 volt, single phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which were used by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupters for personnel protection:    (a)	Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the 120-volt receptacles box inside the house, which was being used to power a saw, was provided with approved ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) for personnel protection.  This condition exposed employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1285
  • · Z (S) $2142

1926.405 B02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2):  All pull boxes, junction boxes, or fittings were not provided with covers:    (a)	Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each energized switch box in the house was adequate provided with a cover to safeguard employees against a potential electrical hazard when turning the on/off button.  The condition exposed employees to an electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 G01 III C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(iii)(C):  Flexible cords and cables were run through  doorways, windows, or similar openings:    (a)  Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the electrical extension cord, which ran through the porch doorway was protected from damage such as door pinch points, between the door and threshold. The cord provided power to a skill saw for an employee.   This condition exposed the employee an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,142 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i) :  Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights and window wells) by the use of covers, guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     (a)	Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.   On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that standard guardrails, covers, or other suitable fall protection system was provided to safeguard employees from falling into the unprotected exterior window well of the house under construction.  This condition exposed employees to the hazard of falling into the window well a distance height of approximately 6'2"
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2142

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,142 · Current $1,285 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.    (a)	Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each protruding footing re-bar on the front porch and side entrance of the house was capped or guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement to employees working on the house under construction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1285
  • · Z (S) $2142

1926.1051 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,607 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a):  Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:    (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the side porch entrance point of access where the break of elevation was 31 inches, a ramp or stairs was provided to give safe access to the 1st floor of the house under construction. This condition exposed the employees to the hazard of falling when ascending and descending a high point of access.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $960
  • · Z (S) $1606.5

1926.1052 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2012
Abate by
May 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,607 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i):  Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one handrail system along the unprotected side:    (a)	Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO.  On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that first flight of the stairway, used by employee to gain access to the 2nd floor of the house under construction, was provided with a least one hand preferably on the right side descending.  This condition exposed the employees to the hazard of falling when ascending and descending the stairway.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1606.5

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332838341.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.