SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 151 STALLION CIRCLE, SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 332838341.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 151 STALLION CIRCLE
- City
- SNOWMASS VILLAGE
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81615
- Mailing
- 132 PARK AVENUE, BASALT, CO 81621
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,607 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from fall objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, employer did not ensure that each employee conducting work in the house under construction was provided hard hats. This condition exposed employees to a possible danger of head in from impact, or from falling or flying objects from elevation, or from electrical shock and burns.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $960
- · Z (S) $1606.5
1926.200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,607 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(1): Construction areas were not posted with required traffic points of hazards: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that traffic control signs or devices were used for protection of construction workers against in-coming or out-coming road users in the residential complex. Employees were sweeping the streets without the use of any traffic control signs or devices for protection. Additionally, an aerial lift operator was working partially on the street without any barricade protection. These conditions exposed employees to strike-by hazards from approaching traffic, construction equipment and moving vehicles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1606.5
1926.404 B01 II
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,142 · Current $1,285 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120 volt, single phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which were used by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupters for personnel protection: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the 120-volt receptacles box inside the house, which was being used to power a saw, was provided with approved ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) for personnel protection. This condition exposed employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1285
- · Z (S) $2142
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, or fittings were not provided with covers: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each energized switch box in the house was adequate provided with a cover to safeguard employees against a potential electrical hazard when turning the on/off button. The condition exposed employees to an electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.405 G01 III C
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(iii)(C): Flexible cords and cables were run through doorways, windows, or similar openings: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the electrical extension cord, which ran through the porch doorway was protected from damage such as door pinch points, between the door and threshold. The cord provided power to a skill saw for an employee. This condition exposed the employee an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,142 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i) : Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights and window wells) by the use of covers, guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that standard guardrails, covers, or other suitable fall protection system was provided to safeguard employees from falling into the unprotected exterior window well of the house under construction. This condition exposed employees to the hazard of falling into the window well a distance height of approximately 6'2"
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2142
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,142 · Current $1,285 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement. (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each protruding footing re-bar on the front porch and side entrance of the house was capped or guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement to employees working on the house under construction.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1285
- · Z (S) $2142
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,607 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the side porch entrance point of access where the break of elevation was 31 inches, a ramp or stairs was provided to give safe access to the 1st floor of the house under construction. This condition exposed the employees to the hazard of falling when ascending and descending a high point of access.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $960
- · Z (S) $1606.5
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 20, 2012
- Abate by
- May 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,607 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one handrail system along the unprotected side: (a) Rudd Construction, Inc., @ 151 Stallion Circle, Snowmass Village, CO. On or before March 15, 2012, the employer did not ensure that first flight of the stairway, used by employee to gain access to the 2nd floor of the house under construction, was provided with a least one hand preferably on the right side descending. This condition exposed the employees to the hazard of falling when ascending and descending the stairway.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1606.5
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332838341.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.