Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HENSON CONSTRUCTION LLC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of HENSON CONSTRUCTION LLC. in ACROSS FROM 6370 STRIP AVE., NORTH CANTON, OH 44720 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 332838549.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Henson Construction LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Henson Construction LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ACROSS FROM 6370 STRIP AVE.
City
NORTH CANTON
State
OH
ZIP
44720
Mailing
11501 PLANTSIDE DR. STE 9, LOUISVILLE, KY 40299
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv):     Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure an all-terrain forklift that was lifting a wooden pallet which supported a scaffold platform was approved by the manufacturer for such use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v):     Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an all-terrain forklift that was supporting a scaffold platform and a wooden pallet was secured to the forks to prevent movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(2):     All ladders used to support ladder jack scaffolds did not meet the requirements of subpart X of thispart -- Stairways and Ladders, except that job-made ladders shall not be used to support ladder jack scaffolds:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a portable stepladder which was used as a scaffold plank support met the requirements of subpart x.  The stepladder was in the closed position and was leaning against a wall as it supported a scaffold plank.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5):     Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a modified ladder jack scaffold platform was not bridged to a wooden pallet platform being supported by a forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about 03/27/12 during the erection of a ladder jack scaffold, the employer did not ensure workers used fall protection devices/system when working on a roof which was 14 feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigied support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure a stepladder that was used to gain access to a scaffold platform was 3 feet above the scaffold platform-landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):     Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    On or about 03/27/12 during the installation of a fall protection system and other construction activities, the employer did not ensure a stepladder that was used to gain access to a scaffold platform was used as recommend by the manufacturer.  The stepladder was leaning against the scaffold platform in the closed position.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Abate by
May 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years:    On 03/27/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure an employee that was operating a rough terrain forklift had been evaluated every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2012
Abate by
May 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):     The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    On 03/27/12 during construction activities, the employer did not ensure a forklift operator was evaluated in accordance with the criteria contained in paragraph L of 29 CFR 1910.178.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Henson Construction LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332838549.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.