Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: T M WALLS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of T M WALLS, LLC in 7134 WILTON CHASE, DUBLIN, OH 43017 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 333289817.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T M Walls, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T M Walls, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
T M WALLS, LLC
Site address
7134 WILTON CHASE
City
DUBLIN
State
OH
ZIP
43017
Mailing
13185 U S HWY 62, ORIENT, OH 43146
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2012
Abate by
Jun 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.          1)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and utilized fall protection while working at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 21 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333289817.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.