Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADVANCED RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING in 89-40 56TH AVENUE, ELMHURST, NY 11373 (NAICS 621512). OSHA activity number 333290989.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Radiological Imaging for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Radiological Imaging is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
89-40 56TH AVENUE
City
ELMHURST
State
NY
ZIP
11373
Mailing
23-34 30TH AVENUE, ASTORIA, NY 11102
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621512
Employees
56
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A04

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 63 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $2,700
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(4): Safeguard(s) designed to protect employees during an emergency (e.g., sprinkler systems, alarm systems, fire doors, exit lighting), were not in proper working order at all times:    a)  On or about 03/30/2012 - establishment, 89-30 thru 89-60 56th Avenue    The bulbs in exit signs were not maintained.    WRITTEN ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 63 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    a)  On or about 03/30/2012 - establishment, 89-30 & 89-40 56th Avenue    Exit doors were not identified with a sign.    WRITTEN ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B05

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 63 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):    a)  On or about 03/30/2012 - establishment, 89-30 56th Avenue    Doors that led to file rooms were not identified as "Not an Exit" or its actual use.    WRITTEN ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 63 exposed
Issued
Jul 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    a)  On or about 03/30/2012 - establishment, 89-30 thru 89-60 56th Avenue    Portable fire extinghers were not identified.    WRITTEN ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333290989.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.