Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BOYET MANUFACTURING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BOYET MANUFACTURING INC. in 900 BILTMORE DR., FENTON, MO 63026 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 333295012.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Boyet Manufacturing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Boyet Manufacturing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
900 BILTMORE DR.
City
FENTON
State
MO
ZIP
63026
Mailing
900 BILTMORE DR., FENTON, MO 63026
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Jan 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i)  Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  1)  For employee(s) who serviced or repaired equipment with multiple energy sources, including but not limited to ACME GRIDLEY screw machines, ACROLOC CNC milling machines, and the Armilles Technologies Robofil 230 EDM machine, lockout tag out machine-specific procedures had not been developed.  2)  For employee(s) who serviced or repaired equipment with multiple energy sources, including but not limited to ACME GRIDLEY screw machines, ACROLOC CNC milling machines, and the Armilles Technologies Robofil 230 EDM machine, the written lockout tag out program did not address verification of isolation, shift changes, coordination with outside contractors and lockout of all energy sources.    3)  For employee(s) who performed set-up operations of screw machines and changed out gears, a written procedure had not been developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.147 C05 I

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Jan 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i)  Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:  1)   For employee(s) who serviced or maintained equipment with multiple energy sources, including but not limited to ACME GRIDLEY screw machines, ACROLOC CNC milling machines, and the Armilles Technologies Robofil 230 EDM machine, locks for air had not been provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Nov 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts and blade:  1)  Secondary department, the LeBlond lathe used by employee(s) several times per week had an unguarded chuck.  2)  Near the QC room, the Tran World Steel Inc. (TWS) lathe used monthly had an unguarded chuck.  3)  Secondary department, the Buffalo 15 drill press used several times per week had an unguarded chuck.  4)  Secondary department, 5-speed drill press (SN 068941) had an unguarded chuck.  5)  CNC department, horizontal 7" Metal Band Saw with hydraulic feed (SN #06042863) had the unused portion of the blade not guarded.  The unused portion of the blade measured approximately 5 3/4 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Oct 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2)  Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:  1) Tool crib area, the Buffalo pedestal grinder (Model B-8, 3450 rpm) lacked safety guards which covered the spindle end, nut, and flange projections on both sides of the grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Oct 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9)  The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  1)  Tool crib area, Buffalo pedestal grinder (Model B-8, 3450 rpm), the distance between the periphery of the abrasive wheel and the grinder on the left side when facing the grinder was approximately 1 3/4 inches.  The distance between the periphery of the abrasive wheel and the grinder on the right side when facing the grinder was approximately 1 1/2 inches.  There was no tongue guard on the right side of the grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i)  Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  1) Break room, the electrical light switch for the break room was missing a cover, resulting in exposed wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Sep 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii)  Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  1)  Near the QC room, the cord and plug for the Trans World Steel Inc. lathe lacked strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2012
Abate by
Oct 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii)  An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years:  1)  For the forklift operator(s) who had not received an operator's performance evaluation since 3/21/2001.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Boyet Manufacturing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333295012.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.