KANSAS CITY, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: A-LUSTER METAL FINISHING
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of A-LUSTER METAL FINISHING in 1019 WEST 24TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 333296390.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-LUSTER METAL FINISHING
- Site address
- 1019 WEST 24TH STREET
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64108
- Mailing
- 1019 WEST 24TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MO 64108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc. On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to physical and chemical hazards resulting from the lack of covers and / or guardrails positioned to prevent employees from falling into open tanks in the anodizing area of the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: On or about 28 March 2012, near the zinc line at the facility, the employer required that employees wear respiratory protection while performing work tasks, but the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program that included required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials including nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, and sodium hydroxide in the chemical storage area, zinc plating, electropolish, black oxide, anodizing, and other production areas of the facility; however, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by and amputation hazards due to the fact that the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to do so.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.179 B05
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane: On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to falling object and splashing chemical hazards in the electropolish, black oxide, and zinc line areas of the facility caused by crane overloading due to absence of marking that shows the rated load of the crane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months: On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to falling object and splashing chemical hazards in the electropolish, black oxide, and zinc line areas of the facility caused by crane malfunction, failure, or overloading due to lack of periodic inspection of the cranes in the past 12 months.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: On or about 28 March 2012, employees working in the Zinc Line area were exposed to eye and face hazards resulting from use of compressed air, measured at over 90 pounds per square inch (psi) of pressure for cleaning purposes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.303 G02 II
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(ii): In locations where electric equipment is likely to be exposed to physical damage, enclosures or guards shall be so arranged and of such strength as to prevent such damage. On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to electric shock hazards resulting from unguarded fluorescent light fixtures suspended in the chemical storage area and locker room that were less than 7 feet above the floor.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.305 E01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures: On or about 28 March 2012, near the black oxide line at the facility, employees were exposed to electrical hazards caused by cabinets, cutout boxes, and fittings in a damp location that were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.305 J01 IV
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(iv): Fixtures installed in wet or damp locations were not approved for the purpose and were not so constructed or installed that water could not enter or accumulate in wireways, lamp holders or other electrical parts: On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to electrical hazards in the anodize, black oxide, and electropolish areas of the facility resulting from light fixtures that were present in damp locations that were not constructed or installed in a manner to prevent water from entering or accumulating in wireways, lamp holders, and other electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about 28 March 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards resulting from the lack of an effective, written hazard communication program that describes how container labeling, material safety data sheets, training, information, and other required critera will be conveyed to employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333296390.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.