Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: SCHNEIDER CUSTOM PAINTING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SCHNEIDER CUSTOM PAINTING in 102 MEADOW LANE, MARLTON, NJ 08053 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 333299469.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schneider Custom Painting for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schneider Custom Painting is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
102 MEADOW LANE
City
MARLTON
State
NJ
ZIP
08053
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1213, MOUNT LAUREL, NJ 08054
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a)Rooftop: Employees working on roofs in excess of 15' were not protected from falls by any means on or about 4/2/12.    NOTE: BECAUSE ABATEMENT OF THIS VIOLATION IS ALREADY DOCUMENTED IN THE CASE FILE, THE EMPLOYER NEED NOT SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OR DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS VIOLATION AS NORMALLY REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333299469.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.