Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: HOGAN'S ALLEY PAINTBALL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HOGAN'S ALLEY PAINTBALL, LLC in 998 NORTH COLONY RD, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 333301356.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hogan'S Alley Paintball, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hogan'S Alley Paintball, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
998 NORTH COLONY RD
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
998 NORTH COLONY RD, MERIDEN, CT 06450
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713990
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1):  The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not provided the employees with training and information on personal protective equipment (PPE) hazard assessment, such as (but not limited to) arm and body protection for cutting fiber optics.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):  An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    WORKSHOP:  The performance of the operator of the powered industrial truck (PIT) was not evaluated at least once in three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts:    WORKSHOP:   The rotating chuck of the Smithy lathe/mill Granite 324 was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    WORKSHOP:  The horizontal shafts of the Baldor buffer were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    WORKSHOP:  	     1.  The end nuts on both wire brush wheels of the Sears Craftsmen were unguarded.    2.  The end nuts on both buffer wheels of the Baldor buffer were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5))    WORKSHOP:   The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) helium and carbon dioxide gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2012
Abate by
Jun 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    WORKSHOP:  The employees were not all provided with training and information in the hazard communication program who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) chemicals helium and carbon dioxide gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333301356.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.