WINDSOR LOCKS, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: PRO HOME IMPROVEMENTS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PRO HOME IMPROVEMENTS in 16 CYPRESS ROAD, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 333301810.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRO HOME IMPROVEMENTS
- Site address
- 16 CYPRESS ROAD
- City
- WINDSOR LOCKS
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06096
- Mailing
- 62 MADISON STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06118
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2012
- Abate by
- May 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Worksite: Employees were engaged in roofing activities 16 feet above ground on a 5:12 pitch roof without utilizing any type of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2012
- Abate by
- May 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Worksite: The side rails of the aluminum extension ladder used to access the roof were not extended at least 3 feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333301810.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.