EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: CLAUDE DUBORD & SON, INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CLAUDE DUBORD & SON, INCORPORATED in 49 BEDFORD STREET, EAST BRIDGEWATER, MA 02333 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 333302891.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLAUDE DUBORD & SON, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 49 BEDFORD STREET
- City
- EAST BRIDGEWATER
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02333
- Mailing
- 45 MAE AVENUE, BRIDGEWATER, MA 02324
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,530 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Location: Jobsite An employee was exposed to struck by hazards from falling debris and mechanized equipment while working in an excavation and not protected by a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1530
- · Z (S) $2550
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Location: Jobsite An employee was working in a trench that was greater than 6 feet deep and was not provided with a safe means of egress.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). The employer had not complied with the provisions of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1)(i) in that: Location: Jobsite An employee was in a trench greater than 6 feet deep with straight cut walls and no cave-in protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333302891.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.