Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CGI

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CGI in 11 NORFOLK STREET, MANSFIELD, MA 02048 (NAICS 511140). OSHA activity number 333305449.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CGI — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CGI is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CGI
Site address
11 NORFOLK STREET
City
MANSFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
02048
Mailing
11 NORFOLK STREET, MANSFIELD, MA 02048
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
511140
Employees
37
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.145 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2): The employer did not use caution sign to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices:      Loading dock: The employer did not post a caution sign to warn employees of potential hazards beyond the trash compactor gate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1275
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,125 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    Facility: The employer did not develop and implement lock-out / tag-out program and procedures for employees trouble shooting, servicing and maintaining including but not limited to the following machines: jet press, shrink tunnel, and paper folder machines .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure againts sliding and collapse:    Facility: The employer did not ensure that material in pallets were stacked in a manner the edge of the pallet was not flush with the rack.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,125 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:      Facility Warehouse: The employer did not ensure that employees operating the forklift were trained before operating the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Facility: The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees who work with chemicals such as Sollube, Isopropyl Alcohol, Oc KK01 - C65, anad A902 Speedy Type Wash.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    Printing Room: The employer did not ensure every container of hazardous chemical was labeled as to identity or hazard warning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used.    Facility: The employer did not have accesible the material safety data sheets for the chemicals that were in used such as Isopropyl alcohol 99%, Prisco Fountain Concentrate H8L, Anchor Typewash, Oce RU01- C65, Metering R. C. Cleaner, P K Special Wash, Speedy Type Wash, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:      Facility: The employer did not provide and maintain sufficient space and access to electrical panel in the printing room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled equipment was not used or installed in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.      Loading dock: The employer did not ensure the outlet box cover was closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View CGI's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333305449.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.