LAKE SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: PARAGON CUSTOM HOMES LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PARAGON CUSTOM HOMES LLC in LOT #4 CHATEAU DUBOIS, LAKE SAINT LOUIS, MO 63367 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 333317428.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARAGON CUSTOM HOMES LLC
- Site address
- LOT #4 CHATEAU DUBOIS
- City
- LAKE SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63367
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 278, WENTZVILLE, MO 63385
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: At the job site, the employer failed to develop and maintain a safety and health program that covered the minimum: a/ Hazard analysis. b/ Hazard control. c/ Competent supervision. d/ Employee training.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, andequipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers: At the job site, the frequent and regular safety inspections were not performed adequately. The following hazards were noted during the OSHA inspection: a/ Poor housekeeping resulting in lumber with protruding nails being placed where employee(s) walked. b/ Lack of suitable safety glasses during machine tool operations. c/ Lack of protective head gear during framing operations. d/ Lack of suitable fire fighting equipment. e/ Permitting smoking around combustible materials suchas accumulated saw dust. f/ Using electrical equipment against the manufacturer's listing. g/ Failure to provide conventional fall protection or in the alternative during sheathing work. h/ Failure to provide conventional fall protection for three wall openings. i/ Failure to provide suitable access for employees having to scale up approximately five feet from one level to another. j/ Failure to ensure that the side rails belonging to a wooden job-made ladder extended a minimum of three feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: At the job site, exposed employees were unable to recognize the following hazards: a/ Poor housekeeping to include lumber with protruding nails. b/ Failure to wear safety glasses when using power tools during framing a home. c/ Failure to wear hard hats when framing a multi-story home. d/ Failure to provide suitable fire protection. e/ Permitting smoking around combustible materials such as saw dust. f/ Permitting the use of a power tap.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails,and all other debris, was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: a/ At the job site, scrap 2 X 4 lumber with protruding nails was placed on the ground where employee(s) were walking.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a/ At the job site, employee(s) framing a multi-story home were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employee(s) were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operationspresent potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a/ At the job site, employees using portable power tools such as circular saws were not provided with or wearing safety glasses or the equivalent.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.403 B01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Suitability for installation and use in conformity with the provisions of this subpart. Suitability of equipment for an identified purpose may be evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose: a/ At the job site, a portable power tap was used to supply electrical power to a variety of power tools. The label engraved in the plastic exterior read that this piece of equipment was not suitable to be used in an outdoor environment.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a/ At the job site, conventional fall protection was not installed during the sheathing of the 12:12 sloped roof deck with a ground to eave height of approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B14
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system: a/ At the job site, two wall openings were not adequately guarded. Both wall openings measured approximately 6'H X 6'W X nine feet high.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards: At the job site, exposed employee(s) were unable to recognize the following fall hazards: a/ Two, unguarded, wall openngs. b/ Sheathing the 12:12 sloped roof deck.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): A stairway or ladder was not provided at all personnel points of access where there is a break inelevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a/ At the job site, employee(s) were climbing down by hand from the roof deck onto a lower wooden platform located adjacent to the front entrance. The distance between the roof deck and the wooden platform was approximately five feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a/ At the job site, the side rails belonging to a wooden, job-made ladder located adjacent to the main entrance exceeded the height of the landing by approximately three inches. b/ At the job site, the side rails belonging to a portable, extension ladder located towards the rear of the home exceeded the height of the roof deck by approximately one foot.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: At the job site, employees were unable to recognize the following hazards: a/ When a ladder, ramp, or stairs was required when moving from one elevation to another. b/ The minimum safe distance for side rails attached to ladders when used to climb from one landing to another.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.150 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction there of: a/ At the job site, a suitable fire extinguisher was not provided for a multi-story home being framed. Cigarette butts were extinguished in piles of saw dust.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16 00:00:00
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16 00:00:00
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15 00:00:00
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in MO
CLINTON, MO—2026-07-14 00:00:00
TORCHYLO BUILDERS, LLC.
BLUE SPRINGS, MO—2026-07-13 00:00:00
JORGE MERIDA
KANSAS CITY, MO—2026-07-09 00:00:00
NIAGARA BOTTLING
MONETT, MO—2026-07-09 00:00:00
MONETT METALS INC.
KANSAS CITY, MO—2026-07-08 00:00:00
NGC CONSTRUCTION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333317428.