BONDUEL, WI —
OSHA Inspection: PAUL HUNTINGTON SALES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PAUL HUNTINGTON SALES in W5066 COUNTY HWY BE, BONDUEL, WI 54107 (NAICS 423110). OSHA activity number 333317923.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PAUL HUNTINGTON SALES
- Site address
- W5066 COUNTY HWY BE
- City
- BONDUEL
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54107
- Mailing
- W5066 CTY HWY BE, BONDUEL, WI 54107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423110
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 C06
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations: a) In the spray room being used for vehicle painting, electrical wiring was not explosion-proof type. b) In the spray room being used for vehicle painting, the ceiling fan was not explosion-proof type. c) In the spray room being used for vehicle painting, outlets and electrical boxes were not explosion-proof type. d) In the spray room being used for vehicle painting, the lighting fixtures were not explosion-proof type. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.107 C07
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(7): Electric lamps outside of but within 20 feet of spraying area(s), and not separated therefrom by partition(s), were not totally enclosed to prevent the falling of hot particles: a) Lighting in the spray room being used for vehicle painting was not totally enclosed. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Company did not implement a respiratory program for employees doing the spray room painting of vehicles. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a) Company did not have a written hazard communication program for their employees. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) Company did not have their cleaner and degreaser spray bottles labeled with their chemical name. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a) Company did not have all of their spray bottles labeled with appropriate hazard warnings. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: a) Company did not have a material safety data sheet for two of the paints used in the spray room. (Diamond Vogel, Cote-All, Multi-Purpose Enamel, AZ-5411 & Kirker Automotive Finish, Ultra-Glo, Acrylic Urethane, UA-41092) ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Paul Huntington Sales
View Paul Huntington Sales's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333317923.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.