Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NIEMANN FLOORING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NIEMANN FLOORING, INC. in 3903 W. ERNESTINE DRIVE, MARION, IL 62959 (NAICS 442210). OSHA activity number 333318251.

Watch Niemann Flooring, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Niemann Flooring, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3903 W. ERNESTINE DRIVE
City
MARION
State
IL
ZIP
62959
Mailing
138 NIEMANN LANE, MURPHYSBORO, IL 62966
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
442210
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):     Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):      Employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet, due to lack of fall protection measures such as a personal fall arrest system or fall restraint system while loading carpet material onto forklifts while at the edge of the open sided storage area.  The rack is used to store carpet rolls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)    Employees were exposed to hazards associated with the unsafe operation of powered industrial vehicles because the employer had fully implemented a Powered Industrial Truck Training Program.  Two of the three operators had taken written test.  There was no on the  job evaluations to ensure they operated the forklift safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):     The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    Employees were exposed to hazards associated with the unsafe operation of powered industrial vehicles because the employer had not certified all operators were competent to run the trucks.  The three authorized employees to operate the forklift had not been certified that they had been trained and evaluated regarding safe powered industrial truck operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):        A hazard assessment was not performed to ensure that employees operating the Cub Cadet 27 HP riding mower were wearing safety eyewear and footwear while using the mower, as the Operator's Manual Safety Precautions mandated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333318251.