ITHACA, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: EDER MARTINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDER MARTINEZ in 901 EAST MAIN ST, ITHACA, NY 14850 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 333321115.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDER MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 901 EAST MAIN ST
- City
- ITHACA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14850
- Mailing
- 36 STEVEN STREET, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/12: Employees were using frayed cord to power a Rigid reciprocating saw.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/12: An employee was using an a-frame type ladder while standing on the top step.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.403 B01 I
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Safety of equipment was not determined on the basis of suitability of the equipment for an identified purpose as evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose. a) At the jobsite, on or about 4/10/12: A common household powerstrip was being used to power construction tools. The common household powerstrip is not listed or labeled for use in construction.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333321115.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.