Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: EL PINOS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EL PINOS in 61 HIGH ST., ORANGE, NJ 07051 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 333876621.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EL Pinos for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EL Pinos is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EL PINOS
Site address
61 HIGH ST.
City
ORANGE
State
NJ
ZIP
07051
Mailing
151 MURRAY ST., NEWARK, NJ 07101
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.      a)61 High St. Orange, NJ:Employee exposed to eye injury while using a nailing gun and not wearing any type of eye protection during framing operations.         Violation observed on or about 4/9/12.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  Note:  If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.    a)61 High St. Orange, NJ:CSHO observed employee engaged in framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately  11 feet to the ground below.  No fall protection was being utilized.         Violation observed on or about 4/9/12.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333876621.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.