LUBBOCK, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: FORD INSULLATION & FIREPLACES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FORD INSULLATION & FIREPLACES in 4414 102ND STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 333885648.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FORD INSULLATION & FIREPLACES
- Site address
- 4414 102ND STREET
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79424
- Mailing
- 909 HWY 62/84, WOLFFORTH, TX 79382
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423330
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about March 13, 2012 at the worksite employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from the roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $3000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that wouldl not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. On or about March 13, 2012 at the worksite employees were exposed to fall hazards while accessing the roof of the structure with a ladder that did not extend 3 ft. above the access point nor was a grabrail available.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1000
- · Z (S) $1800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423330)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333885648.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.