Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: FORD INSULLATION & FIREPLACES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FORD INSULLATION & FIREPLACES in 4414 102ND STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 333885648.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ford Insullation & Fireplaces for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ford Insullation & Fireplaces is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4414 102ND STREET
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79424
Mailing
909 HWY 62/84, WOLFFORTH, TX 79382
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423330
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    On or about March 13, 2012 at the worksite employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from the roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that wouldl not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.    On or about March 13, 2012 at the worksite employees were exposed to fall hazards while accessing the roof of the structure with a ladder that did not extend 3 ft. above the access point nor was a grabrail available.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333885648.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.