BRANDON, MS —
OSHA Inspection: RANKIN PRIMARY CARE CLINIC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of RANKIN PRIMARY CARE CLINIC in 103 SERVICE DRIVE, BRANDON, MS 39042 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 333898237.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RANKIN PRIMARY CARE CLINIC
- Site address
- 103 SERVICE DRIVE
- City
- BRANDON
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39042
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1959, BRANDON, MS 39043
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621111
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $513 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually: (a) Site Wide - On or about April 04, 2012 the employer's exposure control pan was not updated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $513
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure: (a) Site wide - On or about April 04, 2012 the employer had not included any documentation of considerations and implementation of effective safer medical devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 IV A 2
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 21, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A)(2): Contaminated laundry was not placed and/or transported in bags or containers which were labeled or color-coded in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i): (a) Site wide - On or about April 04, 2012 contaminated laundry was not transported in bags or containers that were labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $680
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.1030 D04 IV C
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 21, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(C): Contaminated laundry was shipped off site to a second facility which did not utilize Universal Precautions in the handling of all laundry and the laundry was not placed in bags or containers which were labeled or color-coded in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i): (a) Site wide - On or about April 04, 2012, employee was required to take contaminated gowns home and launder the items at home.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure: (a) Site wide - On or about April 04, 2012 an employee working in the lab and treatment rooms was not offered the hepatitis B vaccine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1030 H02 I
- Issued
- May 16, 2012
- Abate by
- May 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(2)(i): The employer's records for annual bloodborne pathogen training did not include all of the elements required by (h)(2)(i)(A)-(D) of 29 CFR 1910.1030: (a) Site wide - On or about April 04, 2012 the employer did not maintain training records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $510
- — Z (S) $1020
More inspections at Rankin Primary Care Clinic
View Rankin Primary Care Clinic's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621111)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333898237.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.