YOUNGSTOWN, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: R. L. LIPTON DISTRIBUTING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R. L. LIPTON DISTRIBUTING, LLC in 491 MCCLURG RD., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 (NAICS 424810). OSHA activity number 333905032.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R. L. LIPTON DISTRIBUTING, LLC
- Site address
- 491 MCCLURG RD.
- City
- YOUNGSTOWN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44512
- Mailing
- 491 MCCLURG RD., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424810
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: The employer did not ensure and require employees that are exposed to crushing hazards from heavy and potentially rolling objects including, but not limited to: kegs of beer, to utilize protective footwear.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1250
- · Z (S) $1785
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,670 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition: Information plates on the companys Toyota brand forklifts were not legible.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1670
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: Daily examinations were not conducted on fork trucks operated in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): Training did not consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace Training on forklift use did not include formal instruction and an evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years Employees that received forklift training have not had their performance evaluated every three years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Company employees work around potentially hazardous chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. The company did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: Company employees use chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. Material safety data sheets were not available in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Company employees work around potentially hazardous chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. Employees had not received training on the chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424810)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333905032.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.