Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: R. L. LIPTON DISTRIBUTING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R. L. LIPTON DISTRIBUTING, LLC in 491 MCCLURG RD., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 (NAICS 424810). OSHA activity number 333905032.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R. L. Lipton Distributing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R. L. Lipton Distributing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
491 MCCLURG RD.
City
YOUNGSTOWN
State
OH
ZIP
44512
Mailing
491 MCCLURG RD., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424810
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a):     The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:    The employer did not ensure and require employees that are exposed to crushing hazards from heavy and potentially rolling objects including, but not limited to: kegs of beer, to utilize protective footwear.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1250
  • · Z (S) $1785

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,670 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6):     The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition:    Information plates on the companys Toyota brand forklifts were not legible.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1670
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):     Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    Daily examinations were not conducted on fork trucks operated in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii):     Training did not consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace    Training on forklift use did not include formal instruction and an evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Aug 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years    Employees that received forklift training have not had their performance evaluated every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Company employees work around potentially hazardous chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. The company did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:    Company employees use chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. Material safety data sheets were not available in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jul 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area.    Company employees work around potentially hazardous chemicals including but not limited to propane gas. Employees had not received training on the chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333905032.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.