Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: A & J PAINTING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A & J PAINTING LLC in 3004 SLIDE RD., LUBBOCK, TX 79407 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 333905420.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & J Painting LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & J Painting LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A & J PAINTING LLC
Site address
3004 SLIDE RD.
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79407
Mailing
6625 19TH STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79407
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a):     The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there was an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to head injuries while working beneath other employees on scaffolding without headgear.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):     Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall from heights hazards while working from scaffolding that did not bear on mud sills.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):     The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall from heights hazards while working from unstable scaffolding.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):     Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall hazards when scaffolding was not erected by a competent person.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i):     Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    On or about March 30, 2012 on thew east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from scaffolding that was bearing on footings that were not level.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):     When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall hazards when a ladder was not available to access the scaffolding.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i):     Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Guardrail systems were not installed before the scaffold was released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall from heights hazards while working from scaffolding without guardrails on the open sides.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii):     A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below, except on float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent may be used in lieu of toeboards;    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working without headgear beneath other employees on scaffolding that did not have toeboards installed.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2):     Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which secured vertical members together laterally. The cross braces were not of such length as will automatically square and align vertical members so that the erected scaffold was always plumb, level, and square. All brace connections were not secured.    On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure, employees were exposed to fall from heights while working from scaffolding that was not completely crossbraced.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $625 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):     Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:        On or about March 30, 2012 on the east side of the structure under construction, employees were exposed to fall hazards when they accessed the 6 in 12 pitch roof from the sccaffolding without fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $625
  • — C (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333905420.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.