Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIFAB

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MIFAB in 1325 W. 119TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60643 (NAICS 332913). OSHA activity number 333920627.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mifab — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mifab is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIFAB
Site address
1325 W. 119TH STREET
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60643
Mailing
1321 W. 119TH STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60643
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332913
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 76 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1):     Employees must be able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge. A device such as a panic bar that locks only from the outside is permitted on exit discharge doors.    Entire Facility - On or about April 19, 2012, the following exit doors did not provide free egress/escape from the building in that the doors were locked with padlocks, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with fires and other emergencies.     1.  Northeast emergency exit door  2.  Southeast emergency exit door  3.  Southwest emergency exit door
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    Production area - On or about April 19, 2012, a written hazardous energy controlprogram (lockout/tagout considting of specific  procedures and training was not available for employees exposed to the hazards of moving parts when performing services changing blades on the Marvel metal cutting bandsaw, changing dies on the Amada press brakes and Rouselle power press, and other operating equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    Entire Facility - On or about April 19, 2012, the employer did not conduct formal instructions, such as but not limited to lectures and training videos on how to operate reach trucks and sit downs, and practical training, such as, but not limited to, exercises on reach trucks and sit downs, as well as performance evaluations of all employeees who operate reach trucks and sitdowns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    Production area - On or about April 19, 2012, the blade on the Marvel Mark II bandsaw was not completely guarded, in that the lower panel was missing, thereby exposing employees to the hazard associated with contacting a rotating saw blade.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Jan 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    a. Production area - on or about April 19, 2012, the following press brakes were not provided with guards to protect employees from the hazards associated with unguarded points of operations.    1. Amada #HFB-2204  2. Amada Promeoam #HFB-1253  3. Amada (small)    b. Production area - On or about April 19, 2012, the ends on the following  press brakes were not completely guarded, thereby employees were not protected from reaching into hazardous areas.    !. Amada #HEB-2204  2. Amada Promeoam #HFB-1253  3. Amada (small)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Work rests. On offhand grinding machines, work rests shall be used to support the work. They shall be of rigid construction and designed to be adjustable to compensate for wheel wear. Work rests shall be kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage. The work rest shall be securely clamped after each adjustment. The adjustment shall not be made with the wheel in motion.    Production area - On or about April 19, 2012, the following grinders did not have workrest the wheels, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with rotating abrasive wheels.    1. pedestal grinder left side (welding area)   2. Dayton pedestal (leftside)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)    Production area - On or about April 19, 2012, the following pedestal grinders did not have a tongue guards on the grinding wheels, thereby exposing employees to the hazards of flying particles in the event the grinding shattered.    1. Pedestal right & leftsides (welding area)  2. Dayton pedestal leftside
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 C02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Abate by
Aug 22, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(a):     It shall prevent entry of hands or fingers into the point of operation by reaching through, over, under or around the guard;    Production area - On and about April 19, 2012, the Rouselle 80 ton (ser. #18940) part revolution power press was not provided with point of operation guard to prevent employeess from reaching through the rear and sides of the press into the dies area. Employees were thereby exposed to hazards associated with unguarded die openings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1550
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.253 B02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii):     Inside of buildings, cylinders shall be stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 (6.1 m) feet from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior. Cylinders should be stored in definitely assigned places away from elevators, stairs, or gangways. Assigned storage spaces shall be located where cylinders will not be knocked over or damaged by passing or falling objects, or subject to tampering by unauthorized persons. Cylinders shall not be kept in unventilated enclosures such as lockers and cupboards.    Dock door#2 - On or about April 19, 2012, one argon clinder was not in a secured enclosure., thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with unsecured cylinders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333920627.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.