Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: VANKAMPEN INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VANKAMPEN INC. in 287 S. MAIN ST., CLINTONVILLE, WI 54929 (NAICS 722110). OSHA activity number 333938025.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vankampen INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vankampen INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VANKAMPEN INC.
Site address
287 S. MAIN ST.
City
CLINTONVILLE
State
WI
ZIP
54929
Mailing
1135 N. SHAWANO ST., NEW LONDON, WI 54961
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722110
Employees
51
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a):     Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    a)  Employer did not provide elbow high gloves to prevent contact with chemicals while washing dishes.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1890
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    a) The employer did not conduct an assessment of chemicals used in its site and the types of personal protective equipment needed to accomplish tasks in the kitchen.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i):     The employer did not select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that would protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment.    a)  Employees did not have the opportunity to try on or wear personal protective equipment to see if it was satisfactory.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):     The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a)  Safety glasses needed to prevent chemicals from splashing in the eyes from washing dishes were not provided to employees.  Chemicals include Kay SolidSense Sanitizer, Kay SolidSense All Purpose Super Concentrate and the McDelimer.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1890
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i):     The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet.    a)  There was no material safety data sheet list available at this site.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 1 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    (a) The McDelimer in the kitchen used for degreasing did not contain a label.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    (a) The McDelimer in the kitchen did not contain the appropriate hazard warnings for the chemical that can cause inhalation, eye contact, indigestion and skin burns.    aBATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.22 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2):     Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition.    a)  The area by the drive thru where there is a sink drain on the floor there was water spilled and not kept in a dry condition.      ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 C04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2012
Abate by
Jul 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4):     Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition:    (a) Fire extinguisher in the kitchen needed to be recharged and would not be efficient in putting out a fire.    ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION AND ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 333938025.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.