Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LIFELINE PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LIFELINE PRODUCTS, INC. in 3 MARSHALL STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 339112). OSHA activity number 333945061.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lifeline Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lifeline Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3 MARSHALL STREET
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
3 MARSHALL STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339112
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Jul 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    WORKSHOP:  The working/walking area in and around the Trinco sandblaster had accumulated dust due to the re-claim bag had a hole and both hand gloves in the front were mssing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of  personal protective equipment (PPE), such as (but not limited to) hand and arm protection for the employees performing sandblasting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not trained all the employees on the Workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established site specific written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear half face piece cartridge respirators worn by employees during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) grip blast operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):  Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established step-by-step hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures in the machine specific for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment such as (but not limited to) the Everite electrolyte machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Aug 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    WORKSHOP:  The employees, as authorized, affected and other types were not provided with re-training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited not limited to) the Everite electrolyte machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Jul 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating part:    WORKSHOP/GRIT BLASTING DEPARTMENT:  The top of the fan/motor, unknown identification was unguarded and covered with tape.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.305 G01 IV D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2012
Abate by
Jul 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D):  Flexible cords and cables were attached to building surfaces.    WORKSHOP:  The flexible cord to the extension cord used for the Dayton belt grinder was wrapped around the water pipe over the hot water tank and then pullged into the electrical outlet.                           ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Lifeline Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333945061.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.