CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL CUEVAS ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL CUEVAS ROOFING in 831 NEEB RD, CINCINNATI, OH 45233 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 333961035.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL CUEVAS ROOFING
- Site address
- 831 NEEB RD
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45233
- Mailing
- 8833 S. KEYSTONE AVE APT 8, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46227
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions andthe regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections were conducted in that employees were exposed to fall hazards while engaged in a roofing operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employees were engaged in a residential roofing operation on a condominium complex in Cincinnati, Ohio and exposed to a fall hazard in excess of 18 feet while not attaching their conventional fall protection system to a anchor system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16 00:00:00
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16 00:00:00
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16 00:00:00
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16 00:00:00
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16 00:00:00
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16 00:00:00
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15 00:00:00
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15 00:00:00
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15 00:00:00
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333961035.