Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KIK BUILDERS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KIK BUILDERS LLC in 15 KATHERINE STREET, NORTH BRANFORD, CT 06471 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 333973436.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch KIK Builders LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KIK Builders LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KIK BUILDERS LLC
Site address
15 KATHERINE STREET
City
NORTH BRANFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06471
Mailing
10 MARGARET COURT, EAST HAVEN, CT 06512
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupter as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites.    Location: Jobsite    a) The Milwaukee Sawzal plugged into a 120 volt, 20 amp four outlet junction box was not protected by a ground circuit interupter or an assured equipment grounding conductor program.    b) The Makita 7 1/4 inch circular saw plugged into a 120 volt, 20 amp four outlet junction box was not protected by a ground fault circuit interupter or an assurred equipment grounding conductor program.    c) The Makita JR3070CT Sawzaw plugged into a 120 volt, 20 amp four outlet junction box was not protected by a ground fault circuit interupter or an assured equipment grounding conductor program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B04 II

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface were not protected from tripping in or stepping intoor through holes (including skylights) by covers.    Location: Jobsite - First Floor    The following floor holes were not equipped with a cover securely attached to the floor and marked "Hole" or "Cover":    a) 9 inch wide X 12 inch long    b) 15 inch wide X 20 inch long    c) 6 inches square    d) 10 inch wide X 10 1/2 inch long    e) 16 inches square
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1052 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and at least one stair rail along each unprotected side or edge:    Location: Jobsite between the basement and first floor    The 36 inch wide, eleven riser stairway was not equipped with stair rails along both left and right open, unprotected sides of the stairway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $11,000 · Current $6,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    Location: Jobsite    a) The 10 in 12 pitched residential roof with a 7 foot 9 inch fall distance to the street side and an 11 foot 2 inch fall to the backside of the structure was not equipped with a fall protection system.    b) The 31 foot 8 inch long opened sided floor on the backside of the structure was not equipped with a fall protection system.    KIK Builders LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 109177725, citation number 01, item number 002, issued on August 3, 2010 with respect to a workplace located at 14 Lucius Court in Milford, CT and became a final order on August 19, 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6900
  • — Z (R) $11000

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2012
Abate by
May 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    Location: Jobsite    Each employee exposed to falls from elevation were not provided with training program to instruct each employee in the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures to minimize or eliminate those hazards.    KIK Builders LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)which was contained in OSHA inspection number 109177725, citation number 01, item number 003a, issued on August 3, 2010 with respect to a workplace located at 14 Lucius Court in Milford, CT and became a final order on August 19, 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $1300
  • — Z (R) $2640

View KIK Builders LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333973436.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.